<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boohoo does Luella</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gemmacartwright.com/2010/01/boohoo-does-luella/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gemmacartwright.com/2010/01/boohoo-does-luella/</link>
	<description>Fashionable Geekery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:16:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gemma</title>
		<link>http://www.gemmacartwright.com/2010/01/boohoo-does-luella/comment-page-1/#comment-5292</link>
		<dc:creator>Gemma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gemmacartwright.com/?p=391#comment-5292</guid>
		<description>And here&#039;s the Matalan one. It&#039;s near-identical, even down to the styling. Rach has a point on this one - at least Boohoo changed the fabrics a bit.

http://style.bitchbuzz.com/matalans-blatant-obvious-copycat-luella-frock.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here&#8217;s the Matalan one. It&#8217;s near-identical, even down to the styling. Rach has a point on this one &#8211; at least Boohoo changed the fabrics a bit.</p>
<p><a href="http://style.bitchbuzz.com/matalans-blatant-obvious-copycat-luella-frock.html" rel="nofollow">http://style.bitchbuzz.com/matalans-blatant-obvious-copycat-luella-frock.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gemma</title>
		<link>http://www.gemmacartwright.com/2010/01/boohoo-does-luella/comment-page-1/#comment-5290</link>
		<dc:creator>Gemma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gemmacartwright.com/?p=391#comment-5290</guid>
		<description>Harriet - I think it&#039;s a tricky one too. High street retailers copy designers all the time and this would probably be less of an issue if Luella *hadn&#039;t* folded somewhere between boohoo seeing the dresses and putting a cheaper homage into production...

I suppose it depends just how much you love the style. I spotted in a mag this week that Matalan is also doing a version in a yellow floral even closer to the original.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harriet &#8211; I think it&#8217;s a tricky one too. High street retailers copy designers all the time and this would probably be less of an issue if Luella *hadn&#8217;t* folded somewhere between boohoo seeing the dresses and putting a cheaper homage into production&#8230;</p>
<p>I suppose it depends just how much you love the style. I spotted in a mag this week that Matalan is also doing a version in a yellow floral even closer to the original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harriet</title>
		<link>http://www.gemmacartwright.com/2010/01/boohoo-does-luella/comment-page-1/#comment-5289</link>
		<dc:creator>Harriet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gemmacartwright.com/?p=391#comment-5289</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so torn over this. I loves Luella, and it seems wrong to buy something that is a bit of an obvious rip off. But then, as you say, I&#039;m never going to be able to get the real thing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so torn over this. I loves Luella, and it seems wrong to buy something that is a bit of an obvious rip off. But then, as you say, I&#8217;m never going to be able to get the real thing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
